🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has stated to have scraped millions of tracks from Spotify and is preparing to release them publicly.

Potential Impetus for AI Development

Observers noted the apparent data breach could boost artificial intelligence firms searching for data to develop their models.

An entity called Anna’s Archive reported it had obtained 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million rows of associated data such as performer and record names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not constitute its full catalog.

“We have identified and deactivated the malicious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” said a company representative.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an investigation into unauthorized access identified a third party scraped public metadata and used illicit tactics to circumvent DRM protections.

Group's Stated Mission and Concerns

Spotify does not think the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group claimed the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a means of exchanging large data files online.

“Naturally Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s information and culture”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ copyright, remarked the breached music would probably be used for training AI models.

“Educating models on pirated material is unfortunately widespread in the tech sector, so this stolen music is highly likely to end up instructing AI models,” he said.

The group's website makes references to a large online archive, a vast online repository of pirated books that has reportedly been leveraged by the parent company of Facebook to develop its AI models.

A founder of an AI startup wrote on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in principle “build their own personal free version of the service”. He said it could also allow technology firms to “train on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has become a key issue between creatives, writers and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, creative professionals have protested against a government proposal to let AI companies use protected work without permission unless the rights holder signals. Virtually every respondent to a government call for evidence on the proposal has supported artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for science, research and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The government has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.